If you're here because of Harvest's 2026 price increase, the right alternative depends on one question: do you just want a cheaper timer, or have you outgrown time tracking as a standalone tool?
Those are two different problems, and most "best Harvest alternatives" lists blur them. This one won't. I ran a dev shop on Harvest for years, so I'll tell you straight which tools fit which situation, including the ones that aren't us.
| Tool | Best for | Native project mgmt | Resource forecasting | CRM | Pricing model | Starting price* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest (2026) | Billing-heavy teams that only need time + invoicing | No — needs a separate tool | Separate add-on (Forecast) | No | Per-seat + usage fees | ~$9/seat (Teams) + usage |
| Clockify | Budget time tracking at scale | Basic | No | No | Flat per-seat | Free / ~$4/seat |
| Toggl Track | Clean time tracking, deep reporting | Light | No | No | Flat per-seat | Free / ~$9/seat |
| Bonsai | Freelancers & small creative shops | Light | No | Light | Tiered | Entry-level, varies |
| Productive | General agencies wanting full quote-to-cash | Yes | Yes | Yes | Tiered per-seat | ~$9 Essential / ~$25 Pro |
| Accelo | Service firms wanting deep PSA | Yes | Yes | Yes | Quote-based (sales-led) | ~$40+/seat (est.) |
| Treya | Growing software & tech services firms | Yes | Yes (native) | Yes | Flat, no usage penalties | $33.50/seat |
* Starting prices are directional and drawn from each vendor's published pricing where available. Accelo doesn't publish pricing publicly, data derived from individual customer reports.
Be honest with yourself first: if a standalone timer and invoicer was genuinely the right shape for your business, and price is the only reason you're leaving, these two will do the job for less.
The value play. The free plan covers unlimited users and unlimited projects — a combination nothing else at this price matches — and paid tiers start around $4–5.49 per seat per month. There are no proposals, contracts, or client portal at any tier. It's a timer that scales cheaply. That's the whole pitch, and for some teams that's enough.
The nicer-to-use timer. Free for up to 5 users, then $9/seat (Starter) and $18/seat (Premium) on annual billing. Deeper reporting and stronger integrations than Clockify, at a higher per-seat cost. Same ceiling, though: no proposals, contracts, or client portal.
Here's the catch with both, and I'll say it plainly because it's the reason this page exists: if you're a growing shop, a cheaper timer solves this month's problem and recreates next year's. You'll be back on a page like this one, migrating again, because the underlying issue was never the price of the timer. It was that your operations live in four disconnected tools.
Bonsai and FreshBooks are worth a look. Bonsai bundles project tracking, time logging, and invoicing for small creative and digital shops. FreshBooks leans accounting-first. Both are fine at small scale. Both start to strain the moment you're staffing multiple concurrent projects and need to see utilization and margin — which is the exact point where the next category matters.
This is the real fork in the road, and it's where the Harvest price increase is actually doing you a favor by forcing the question. Once you're running a team across many client projects, the tool that matters isn't the one with the best timer — it's the one where your CRM, projects, time, invoicing, and resource forecasting are one connected system instead of four apps and a spreadsheet holding them together.
There are a few real options here. I'll be fair about them.
The strongest general-agency all-in-one. It covers the full quote-to-cash workflow — projects, time, billing, and resource planning with real-time utilization and margin — at published pricing of roughly $10/seat (Essential), $25/seat (Professional), and $33/seat (Ultimate) on annual billing. Modern UI, no two-month onboarding. If you're a general marketing or creative agency, it's an excellent choice, and I'd genuinely rather you use Productive than the wrong tool. The main things to weigh: it's built for agencies broadly rather than software/technology firms specifically. The features most dev and IT shops need tend to sit in the pricier Professional tier and up, and you're going to have to shoehorn (and therefore lose) data that's important to you.
The deepest PSA in this group, and the heaviest. It connects sales, project delivery, and billing with retainer management and utilization tracking, but it doesn't publish pricing — you go through a sales team — and market estimates put it in the $40–100/seat range. Its average implementation runs around two months, and the interface leans on PSA-specific terminology that takes time to learn. Powerful if you have the budget and patience. Overkill and over-priced if you're a lean shop that wants to be running this week, not next quarter.
If someone points you at these: they're built for large organizations with dedicated ops staff and enterprise budgets. For a growing small-to-mid shop they're the opposite of Harvest's problem — not too little, but far too much. Note them and move on.
Here's the gap none of the above sits squarely in: a growing software, IT, or technology services firm that has clearly outgrown a standalone timer, but doesn't want to pay enterprise-PSA prices or spend two months in onboarding to get there.
That's the business I built Treya for, because it's the business I used to run.
Treya is a vertically integrated platform — CRM, project management, time tracking, invoicing, and resource forecasting in one connected system. Not a timer with a forecasting product bolted on the side (the thing that always bothered me about Harvest), and not four separate tools you're reconciling by hand every month. When a client, a project, a logged hour, an invoice, and a capacity forecast all live in the same model, the manual reconciliation work that quietly eats a services firm's margin just goes away.
Two things make it different from the other all-in-ones above:
It's built for a specific kind of business, not agencies in general. A tool that understands how a software or technology services shop actually runs — scoping, staffing, utilization, billable-versus-invested time, the handoff between sales and delivery — fits how you work instead of asking you to bend around a generic agency template. In the age of AI, building for a tight vertical is finally practical, and it beats general-purpose every time for the firm inside that vertical.
The pricing doesn't punish you for growing. Flat and transparent — no usage fees stacking on top as you add clients, projects, and invoices. The thing that turned a Harvest renewal into a shock is the exact thing that shouldn't exist in a tool meant to grow with you.
→ See Treya's pricing and features — or if you want to sanity-check the whole category first, start with what actually happened to Harvest's pricing.
Migration is the fear that keeps people paying a bad renewal. It shouldn't be. From Harvest you can export your time entries, projects, and clients as CSV files, then import clients and projects into the new tool and set your billing rates to match. The data comes with you. The lock-in is mostly in your head.
It depends on your situation. For a cheaper standalone timer, Clockify (from ~$4/seat) or Toggl Track (from ~$9/seat). For a growing software or technology services firm that's outgrown standalone time tracking, a connected platform like Treya — which combines CRM, projects, time, invoicing, and resource forecasting for that specific type of firm — is a better long-term fit than replacing one timer with another.
Yes. Clockify offers a free plan with unlimited users, and Toggl Track is free for up to 5 users. Both are time-tracking-first with no proposals, contracts, or client portal.
If a standalone timer was ever the right tool for your business and price is your only issue, that's a fine move. But if you're a growing shop already stitching together separate tools for CRM, project management, and invoicing, a cheaper timer solves cost and leaves the harder problem — disconnected operations — exactly where it was.
No. Harvest lets you export time entries, projects, and clients as CSV, which import cleanly into most alternatives. Migration is usually a day of setup, not a project.